![]() |
|
|
Standard Truckload |
Transportation AgreementsMODEL SHIPPER/CARRIER AGREEMENT The American Trucking Association ("ATA") and the National Industrial Traffic League ("NITL"), a large shipper's group, have published a model truckload motor carrier-shipper agreement with commentary. See ATA/NITL Agreement. This Agreement is an excellent starting point for negotiating motor carrier service terms and conditions. Because it is a negotiated agreement between major trucking and shipping organizations, it should be presented as a fair compromise. In my book, "Protecting Motor Carrier Interests in Contracts", I list the "Dirty Dozen" or 12 typical contract provisions which appear in shipper generated contracts and which must be exercised from the contract as part of a carrier review. Use of the ATA/NITL model contract will largely render this contract work unnecessary. Major issues such as (1) shipper's unilateral right of offset; (2) overbroad indemnity provisions; (3) confusing additional insured language; (4) incorporation of special and consequential damage provisions; (5) failure of duty to mitigate; (6) the absence of interest on late payments; have all been addressed and satisfactorily resolved from a motor carrier point of view. The document
as published on the ATA's includes commentary and instruction. Because
the agreement has been endorsed by major shipper organizations, I highly
recommend that carriers enter negotiations with the position that the
model agreement is a fair and proper starting place. Contracts Pursuant
to the provisions of 49 U.S.C. §14101(b), carriers may enter written
signed agreements with shippers and brokers which may expressly waive
application of otherwise applicable general rules of federal transportation
law. A great majority of the interstate truckload traffic in this country
moves pursuant to such contract, which can contain provisions that dramatically
and adversely effect the rights and remedies of motor carriers. Broadly
worded indemnity clauses, the granting of the unilateral right to offset
unliquidated damage claims against freight charges, and draconian insurance
provisions are just some of the issues which carriers must understand.
Some of these contracting issues are discussed in the attached article
and our firm has prepared a booklet to be used as a contracting aid
by its clients in formulating and reviewing transportation agreements.
A large portion of our practice is devoted to transportation contracting,
including agreements for dedicated services and logistics contracts. Shipper/Carrier
Agreement Rules Circulars Frequently
shipments move on rate confirmation sheets or other abbreviated notices
but the parties have no agreement about general rules of commerce, claims
processing or accessorial charges. Carriers are allowed to publish rates
and rules tariffs to be provided to their customers upon request and
every thoughtful carrier should have such a publication. Carriers who
do not have a thorough rules tariff should consult their transportation
consultant or call this firm. Bills of Lading There
is no specified bill of lading required by federal regulation. Carriers,
not shippers or brokers, are required to issue the receipt or bill of
lading, but all that is required of its content is that the consignor
and consignee be named, the origins and destinations identified, the
number of packages, the description of the freight, and the weight,
volume or measurement for rating purposes be included. 49 C.F.R. §§373. For more on contracts, tariffs and bill of lading, refer to the Articles on Transportation Law.
info@transportationlaw.net |